Tulfo

Tulfo maghahain ng resolution para makialam ang UN General Assembly tungkol sa hidwaan sa WPS

Mar Rodriguez Jun 10, 2024
192 Views

๐—œ๐—ก๐—œ๐—›๐—”๐—œ๐—ก ๐—ป๐—ถ ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐˜‚๐˜๐˜† ๐— ๐—ฎ๐—ท๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—Ÿ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐—”๐—–๐—ง-๐—–๐—œ๐—ฆ ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐˜† ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด. ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐˜„๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ง. ๐—ง๐˜‚๐—น๐—ณ๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜‚๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—ž๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ ๐—ฑ๐—ฒ ๐—ฅ๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ฒ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—น๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐˜†๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—บ๐˜‚๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ด๐—ผ๐—ฏ๐˜†๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ผ ๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐˜๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—™๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ป ๐—”๐—ณ๐—ณ๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐˜€ (๐——๐—™๐—”) ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ด-๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐˜€๐—ผ๐—น๐˜‚๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ ๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฑ ๐—ก๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป (๐—จ๐—ก) ๐—š๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—”๐˜€๐˜€๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—น๐˜† ๐˜‚๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ถ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ด๐—ถ๐—น ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ป๐—ถ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ธ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ถ๐—น๐—น๐—ฒ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ด๐—ฎ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—ถ๐—ป ๐—ฎ๐˜ ๐˜„๐—ฎ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ต๐—ฎ๐—ฏ๐—ฎ๐˜€ ๐—ป๐—ฎ ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ด๐—ฏ๐˜‚-๐—ฏ๐˜‚๐—น๐—น๐˜† ๐˜€๐—ฎ ๐—ช๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜ ๐—ฃ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—น๐—ถ๐—ฝ๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐—ฒ๐—ฎ (๐—ช๐—ฃ๐—ฆ).

Sinabi ni Tulfo na isusulong nito ang House Resolution No. 1766 alinsunod sa itinatakda ng UN Convention on the Law of the Sea (UNCLOS) at sa 2016 ruling ng Permanent Court of Arbitration upang magkaroon ng agarang solusyon sa matagal ng problema sa WPS na nararanasan ng mga Pilipinong mangingisda.

‘The landmark decision of the Permanent Court of Arbitration in Case No. 2013-19 known as Republic of the Philippines vs People’s Republic of China. Conclusively invalidate the Chinese government’s expansive claims under the so-called “nine dash-line” declaring such to be incompatible with the provisions of the UNCLOS, thus upholding the Philippines’ sovereign rights over EEZ and continental shelf in the WPS,” sabi ni Tulfo.

Sinabi pa ni Tulfo na sa kabila ng naging hatol. Nanantiling matigas ang China na kilalanin o i-acknowlodge at sundin ang naturang kautusan o arbitration award. Kung saan, ipinagpapatuloy parin nito ang mga aksiyong labag sa batas o “unlawful actions” sa WPS.

Binigyang diin ng kongresista na kabilang sa mga labag sa batas na ginagawa ng China ay ang patuloy na harassment at pangbu-bully nila sa mga barko ng Pilipinas at ang pagpapatayo ng China ng military installations, airstrips at iba pang estratehikong istraktura sa isang artificial island na nasa loob mismo ng teritoryo ng Pilipinas.

“This year alone, aggressive maneuvers and water cannon attacks by Chinese vessels against the Philippine Coast Guard (PCG) and Filipino fisherfolk underscores China’s blatant disregard for international law and the legal maritime rights of the Philippines. Thereby, diminishing our territorial integrity and compromising regional stability and security,” wika pa ni Tulfo.

Ayon pa kay Tulfo, ang nasabing House Resolution ay base na rin sa kamakailang pahayag ni President Ferdinand “Bongbong” R. Marcos,Jr. patungkol sa kagustuhan ng bansa na maresolusyunan ang problema sa WPS sa pamamagitan ng dialogue at diplomasya